Home ] Up ] [ Communing on Grace ] The Problem ] In Our Image ]

Communing on Grace


Messages and Responses on the Subject of Grace

From Heather:

I took my Twelve Pages of Wil and sat by the pool today for about 3 hours (getting my very white self burned in the process), armed with Bible, dictionary, highlighter pen, ink pen, and spiral notebook. I have more pondering to do, more rereading to do, but I'm sending along my thoughts thus far!

The first section you sent, "Grace", which seemed to be sort of an introduction of sorts, is really well-written. I highlighted parts of it just because I liked 'em. My favorite passage therein is that whole paragraph about "life is... for the perfecting of our souls". That's perfectly stated and true.

When I was reading all your references, I stumbled on the revelation of Romans 9 and 10, which you later referred me back to (but I'd already highlighted and marked it up from the first reading!). Grace comes from faith, not performance. Is that liberating! It's amazing to me that I knew that already, but this time it kicked me in the gut and I really understood it. Grace is absolutely free, and that's what I am when I receive it.

It's fascinating that God allows us to be simple and faltering and even doubtful in order to undeniably prove His mercy (Romans 11:32).

By your Romans 3:22 reference, you've stated: "All have sinned, but freely receive His grace". The verse, in fact, says that He freely receives us. I agree with you that, once we do accept grace, we receive it without working for it or cashing in Jesus Points for it. But I think the important message in this particular verse is that He opens Himself to us in spite of ourselves, which also ties in with the Jeremiah 51:5 reference about God not forsaking Israel, even in light of all her evil.

I am intrigued by the cause/effect thing happening in I Peter 1:5. It says that God always planned to save us, and if we believe He can, then He will. Of course, you and I know that the proverbial price has already been paid, the work is done. But in order for salvation to become real and alive in us, we have to first believe in it. I hadn't realized before exactly how much of this all pivots on faith, I mean the very existence of His power in our lives comes and goes based on whether our Faith Switch is in the On or Off position. The only limits in all of creation and beyond that exist for God, then, are the limits our doubts put on Him. Thomas could only believe as far as his physical eyes could see, but if Jesus is to us what our faith eyes see, then He truly becomes unimaginably limitless and powerful and capable and magnificent. He is what we allow Him to be.

I have a couple of questions on your references; please enlighten me on these areas. First, Matthew 8:11, you say "God will save all"; that's the verse that says "suffer the little children to come unto Me", etc. And then I Corinthians 2:8,9, you say "by grace, not by works". The verse says that "eyes have not seen" and so forth, all that God has planned for us. I'm densely missing your point with these two references, not seeing what you've seen in them. Care to elaborate?

******

 

In a message dated 9/5/98 1:08:11 AM, HRS102975 writes:

<<I have a couple of questions on your references; please enlighten me on these areas. First, Matthew 8:11, you say "God will save all"; that's the verse that says "suffer the little children to come unto Me", etc. And then I Corinthians 2:8,9, you say "by grace, not by works". The verse says that "eyes have not seen" and so forth, all that God has planned for us. I'm densely missing your point with these two references, not seeing what you've seen in them. Care to elaborate?>>

Actually the suffer little children isn't Matt 8:11; that one is Matt 19:13 but it's covered more extensively in Lue 18:15-17. The best ideas come by accident and this is a case in point. In looking at it I thought about todays 6 to 9 year old children and pictured Jesus using THEM as an example. I decided to look up the word referenced in my Greek key Word Bible. It's "brephon" and referes to a new born infant. The implication is "as straight from the womb. Hmmmm. How is a newborn? A blan set of neurons waiting to begin forming cynapses at a record pace.

This doesn't seem to be talking about the innocense of youth so much as the state of coming to God with a completely blank slate -- no preconceived ideas because what Jesus has to teach us is so radically different from what we've assumed, that ANYTHING we believe is going to get in the way of understanding what He's teaching.

Look at Rev. 3:14-17. This is AFTER God has spoken to the Philadelphia (brotherly love) church an is now taling to the Laodicean (comfort zone) church. He accuses them of being rich and in need of nothing but points out they are poor and naed and miserable, instead. My idea is that this refers to them thining they have all the understanding necessary and don't need to learn anything else. Go ahead to verse 20 -- Jesus is standing outside their door knocking to be let into their lives.

All this falls in rather well to what we have been doing -- putting asside what we have always assumed and really listening to Jesus.

As far as your questions on those other two scriptures, Matt 8:11 deals with the superior faith of the Centurion and my God will accept all statement refers to the fact that God will be accessable to the Gentiles -- at a time when the word seemed only for the Jews.

In 1Cor 2:8-9, I'm including understanding as a work or a gift of grace. God gives us the understanding; we don't arrive at it on our own. That even begs another question: Is faith a work if we provide it or is faith also a GIFT of God. He says that he has closed the eyes of Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles have believed. It seems we don't provide ANYTHING on our own -- it ALL comes as a gift of God. Further evidense that all that happens in this life is just for the edifying of our souls.

More later,

Wil

*********

I Corinthians 8... our individual wisdom can in fact be destructive to those lacking it, by causing confusion or personal compromise on their part. Tough to swallow, but clearly true. Dang. I don't think I like that verse, especially not when you tie it with Galatians 5:13, which tells us that our freedom is not an excuse or crutch, but instead is a state of responsibility toward others... that's heavy. Freedom is, then, a great burden. The freedom of understanding is the acceptance of responsibility on our part for those with less understanding. No wonder Solomon seems so sad (ignorance really is bliss!).

2 Corinthians 12:9: His grace is sufficient. Paul says here that he embraces his own weakness because God reveals His strength through it. Our weakness and humanity then becomes something of a coccoon from which God emerges this incredible butterfly full of color and light. The weakness, or the coccoon, is a necessary part of the evolution, revolution, and revelation.

OK, Part II, "The Existentialism of Grace".

I think I'll do that in a second e-mail.

More to come, like Johnny Carson...

~Heather

What a word that is to type, "existentialism".

I looked up the word "image": an outward impression of character; a personification. Image is external behavior revealing internal truths. That reminds me that we are created in God's image, not to "look like Him" (duh), but to behave ~ to BE ~ such that His true character is known.

I'd like to know the actual Greek or Hebrew definitions for ousia and prosopon. Our definition of essence is: the intrinsic or indispensable qualities or properties that identify. And expression is defined as: communication, a symbol or indication, a formula, manner, or conveyance. OK, got it. I'm just wondering if the definitions you've got there are heavier or more explicit or just different.

******

 

In a message dated 9/5/98 1:29:32 AM, HRS102975 writes:

<<'d like to know the actual Greek or Hebrew definitions for ousia and prosopon. Our definition of essence is: the intrinsic or indispensable qualities or properties that identify. And expression is defined as: communication, a symbol or indication, a formula, manner, or conveyance. OK, got it. I'm just wondering if the definitions you've got there are heavier or more explicit or just different.>>

The best is for prosopon : The most accurate rendition is "as the expression on one's face as a representation of one's state of mind." I think that is just perfect -- better for description of god's image than hypostasis, which is how God manifests Himself to us. That would be "Father Son Holy Spirit." Prosopon gives us further opportunities for expression than just those three.

 

In a message dated 9/5/98 1:29:32 AM, HRS102975 writes:

<<I'd like to know the actual Greek or Hebrew definitions for ousia and prosopon. Our definition of essence is: the intrinsic or indispensable qualities or properties that identify. And expression is defined as: communication, a symbol or indication, a formula, manner, or conveyance. OK, got it. I'm just wondering if the definitions you've got there are heavier or more explicit or just different.>>

Heather as best as I can tell ousia is the unnowableness of god -- that which is unavailable to our carnal perspective and can only be interprested by studying the hypostasis and prosopon which god reveals to us. This reverts bac to what we have been talking about regarding becomeing Jesus in thought and action -- why Jesus said, "If you have seen me you have seen the Father and relates to the differences between gonsos and epignosos.

More later

Wil

******

I like your God as three "save as" representations analogy. I understand it in terms of the sun. The sun is heat, light, and energy. All three of these make up the sun, but alone, heat is not the sun, heat is just heat. Jesus is not the beginning and end of God, but merely a third of the entire being of God. God, then, is equal to the sum of His parts. I didn't express that very well. Will try again later.

Aha! "...we are all predestined to be saved because we already are. We just don't all realize it". This is the revelation/conviction ~ the awareness and acceptance of our sinfulness and His holiness, of all that we lack and His absolution. Bang. Seems so simple.

You mention multiple resurrections. I have always believed that referred to the spiritual death (to sin) and resurrection (to Christ), and then the physical death (kicking the bucket) and resurrection (at the time of Rapture when we're joined together with Him). Two resurrections. Then there's His resurrection, that's three. Am I missing any?

I like the idea of life as a virtual reality exercise. This isn't the real thing. I heard a song that says "Life is a dream and Heaven's reality". Hmm.

More on this later, I'm sure.

~Heather

I love this section. Well, hey, it's all wonderful so far, but I really love this part.

Got me thinking again about how cliquish religion is. God gave everyone a fair shot at knowing and understanding Him, not just one group or sect. Since we've all sinned, I don't know why we insist on thinking we've got a head start toward Heaven, a leg up on everyone else. And that's what's cool about God... no matter what time you start running in the race, you're on the same path as the runners before you, and you don't just catch up with them... on good days you pass them by. But they can catch up to you, too. It's cool. No one has the monopoly on God. It's open day at the marketplace for all of us.

You say that Peter knew when he woke, that his dream was about grafting the Gentiles into the vine, so to speak. I read there that he was confused by his dream when he woke up, and I was so eager to get back to what you wrote, that I didn't read on far enough to find his moment of revelation. Of course, further on in the book he understands what it meant, but it seems to me he had to do a little pondering on it before it came to him fully.

"Don't eat by them, they're Porkers"??? My goodness.

I don't have a lot to say on this portion, not yet. I want to read Romans 9:30 - 10:4 again, and 11:1-36. I was reading out of the Contemporary English Version, and want to read it again in the King James. For now, these are my rough and in some cases, already stated, thoughts.

Grace cannot be earned ~ the only thing we do that saves us is believe. And because we believe and receive grace, everything we could think to do or not do is covered or completed in His eyes. Nevertheless, we strive to do good, not to earn mercy, but to share it. No one can repay God's goodness, only give it away to others. So if a serial killer calls out to God on his deathbed for salvation and believes he's received it, he's as saved as I am, despite my life of living "this life" and his living "that life". Our goodness may earn us those extra crowns and trophies, but goodness doesn't do anything at all to save us. Interesting: faith without works is dead, but works without faith are equally dead.

Thank you for slurping me into this most fascinating journey. I look forward to more, soon. Always grateful for the revelations.

~Heather, Sunburned Variety

 

 

 

 

Message 1 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 3/22/03 5:25 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Martin Abrine
Message-id: <20030322172522.21493.00008104@mbs-m04.aol.com>




Justice, I called on you
when I was good;
you knew I served
stew to the poor
yet mocked my effort,
no benefit fulfilled
in their death
these orphans
who I identified
as me
when they pleaded
for the love I know nothing about
because I never had it
and I know not
if love looks like
my ugly face saved
for laughter
or looks like grace

Message 2 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 3/23/03 6:19 AM Central Daylight Time
From: []LDRS NOVLPapa
Message-id: <20030323061949.01207.00006920@mbs-r04.aol.com>




>Justice, I called on you
>when I was good;

Strong and telling first lines. How we seek justice when we are good, mercy when not; and so seldom for others. I want more time to spend with the poem before suggesting anything. Be patient with me. This has been an emotionally exhausting week for those who feel.





`/;o)>NOVL Papa

The Writer's Block!



Message 3 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 3/30/03 12:51 AM Central Daylight Time
From: []LDRS NOVLPapa
Message-id: <20030330005112.24296.00015642@mbs-r04.aol.com>




Sorry, Martin, for taking so long. A good poem tends to settle in and resist meddlers. After living with this for a week, I don't know that I would suggest too much in the way of changes, since anything I might write would dilute your voice. However, some things are less than clear -- especially to those not making the justice/mercy dichotomy their life's study.

When it comes to choosing justice or mercy, i go with mercy every time. Justice kills; mercy forgives. Only mercy (grace) can cure the problems. Justice does away with the perpetrator without addressing the underlying issues. Justice wouldn't care whether you had shown mercy in the past because justice is like the laws of nautre -- coldly immutable -- a pound of flesh is required. Maybe that's the point of your poem, but it's not clear.

It is grace that cuts against the grain of nautre. Its highter calling is what sets us apart from the animal world. It is the image in which we have been created, proving the god we have subsequently created is not the same as that which has created us.

With those points in mind...:

<< Justice, I called on you>the WHY of this is unknown, yet seems germane to the issue.
when I was good;>or were you seeking retribution for a perceived slight in a moment of self-righteousness, since we do not seek justice during periods of guilt?
you knew I served
stew to the poor
yet <you> mocked my effort,
no benefit fulfilled
in their <ultimate?> death
these orphans
who I identified
as me
when they pleaded
for the love I know nothing about
because I never had it>the real stew of the issue>
and I know not
if love looks like
my ugly face saved
for laughter
or looks like grace >>NOw, as I mentioned above, this has meaning for me because of my perspective; but is it so accessible to others and am I even in the same room as what you are trying to portray?

Or is simply a guestion of why the innocent suffer along with the guilty?








`/;o)>NOVL Papa


Message 4 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 3/30/03 2:27 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Martin Abrine
Message-id: <20030330142659.21493.00042229@mbs-m04.aol.com>




  I wrote this poem mostly on instinct. Some of the words just seemed like the right ones.  I've heard the term "grace" but never quite understood what it meant. Nevertheless it seemed like the right one.
  It surprises me that it rings a chord with you, because I don't even undestand what I wrote or what it means exactly.
    "Justice, I called on You".  As a child I was an idealist.  I could forgive my Father's abuse as a sad result of his abuse in an orphanage.
    But he saw me as the enemy, privileged, arrogant elite, one of the outsiders, not as his own son.
    My Mother saw compassion as weakness.  Her parents didn't discuss the Great Depression. She claims they protected her from the knowledge and she didn't notice their anguish. She didn't let WW2 get to her. Nothing bothered her.
    She would have respected me more had I killed my Father. However, I don't think I would have enjoyed receiving her respect when she would have visited me in Jail. [Jewel thieves receive respect in movies if they are very clever. My Mother thought that cowards, even if good, were lower than thieves.]
    She and I protected my younger brother(12 years younger).  She said to my Father, you're not going to destroy another child. (Too late for me, the broken one.)
    Perhaps a more careful analysis later. Thinking is painful.

Message 6 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 3/31/03 8:18 AM Central Daylight Time
From: []LDRS NOVLPapa
Message-id: <20030331081805.24296.00018714@mbs-r04.aol.com>




>  It surprises me that it rings a chord with you, because I don't even
>undestand what I wrote or what it means exactly.

Isn't poetry amazing, Martin? I think we have hit upon a common chord, here. I think the example of your mother further illustrates my concept that it is shared pain which draws us together into a common hug. Those spared from pain suffer from stunted emotional growth, remaining little more than spoiled children. I, also, suffered abuse as a child.

I want to further develop this, but I too need time to put my thoughts together. I think you've started something worthwhile.



`/;o)>NOVL Papa

Message 7 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 4/6/03 9:55 PM Central Daylight Time
From: []LDRS NOVLPapa
Message-id: <20030406225556.21592.00010016@mbs-r04.aol.com>




>Some of the words just seemed like the right ones.  I've heard the term
>"grace" but never quite understood what it meant. Nevertheless it seemed like
>the right one.

You're correct; it is the right one. Grace is the most misunderstood concept that so many experts think they understand. The fact that there are so many books on the subject should clue us in. As originally expressed, grace is unmerited pardon. You can't earn it. You can't deserve it. It's a windfall decision snapping the hangman's rope as the trapdoor springs open.

So, why is it so hard to understand? Because no religionist worthly of his tithe wants to acknowledge that God is so free with compassion. There MUST still be a condition, even if it is only to BELIEVE, be baptized, and receive... whatever. It's a control issue.

Howsomever, IF grace is what is seems to be, then we don't need no stinkin' batches, ya hear. But, as I see it, that is exactly what it means -- to the entire world including all those creeps we are sure belong on hot coals. Any god who holds against his creation the very flaws he built into it, isn't worthy of worship -- at least not of mine. I'd rather go to hell with the poor saps than dance on their pain in paradise. Besides, what kinda paradise is any parent going to enjoy if they know ANY of their kids are in hell?

Good think the gods we;ve created in our image is not the one in whose image we are in the process of being created.

If you wanna continue this, just let me know, Martin. I think your poem springs from a well of conflict in need of plumbing. I've been there too.





`/;o)>NOVL Papa

The Writer's Block!


Message 8 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 4/8/03 8:42 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Martin Abrine
Message-id: <20030408214215.02881.00001572@mbs-m04.aol.com>




    I can not imagine any baby as being evil.  It must be taught.
    I can not imagine anyone choosing to be evil.
    If I wasn't so afraid, I would prefer to love everyone.
    There are those who are so dangerous, I must avoid them.  I am not wise enough to teach them to be good.  If they threaten my life, I must attack them.
    I can forgive from a distance.  I wish I could forgive up close.  "Hello psychopath: Those who abused you do not represent all of mankind. There is love out there if you would allow it. Could you please put down the knife before hugging anyone. No one will welcome your knife in the heart and WE are not THEY."
    In the old days, when movies were less graphic, I could identify with the villain.  I remember seeing a movie where the villain had a beloved pet dog, and when the "hero" broke down the door the villain's dog was crushed to death. The villain cried. This was supposed to be funny-- the hero crowed. I thought this was the ultimate tragedy that the sliver of the villain's humanity was destroyed and the hero was corrupted by his Glee.
      Who, if given the knowledge and understanding of how to love and be loved would not choose it. The trouble is that it 's hard to wake up the good side of angry people-- to give them what they need, not what they want and have them open a gift box that comes with instructions written in their own lost language that would cry with joy, laugh about the silliness of a hate that destroys their natural born allies--- carriers of each others salvation.

Message 9 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 4/9/03 6:46 AM Central Daylight Time
From: Martin Abrine
Message-id: <20030409074632.02881.00002977@mbs-m04.aol.com>




see "Welcome" in the  "Coffeehouse" where we might be able to get a discussion going:
Poetry Coffeehouse
aol://5863:126/mBLA:384221


Message 10 of 10 Subject 6 of 6
Subject: Re: Alone (Martin Abrine)
Date: 4/9/03 10:21 PM Central Daylight Time
From: []LDRS NOVLPapa
Message-id: <20030409232143.29206.00002574@mbs-r04.aol.com>




Gawd Amighty, Martin, this is so deep I have to print it out and carry it around with me for a while. AND, no I cannot imagine anyone choosing to be evil either -- or gay for that matter. But, if one thinks there is no way they can ever overcome their nature and achieve grace. then why even bother to try. If one knows they will be accepted no matter how much of a failure they might appear to be, then maybe they might just put down that knife. It's worked for me a coupla times. I even got a black street gang to give me a pass one time -- and I was only 15 at the time.

>I remember seeing a movie where the villain had a beloved pet dog, and when
>the "hero" broke down the door the villain's dog was crushed to death. The
>villain cried. This was supposed to be funny-- the hero crowed. I thought
>this was the ultimate tragedy>>

I hated a John Cleese movie, that everyone else loved, called A Fish Called Wanda for the same reason. We were supposed to laugh at the sight of an old crotchety woman's dogs being killed off and I just couldn't. they were the only things that brought her any joy in life at all. It all seemed just cruel to me. We oughta have a beer together sometime.

I think the only way to overcome evil is to no longer fear what it can do to us. How's that for an easy answer? But, as the mob shouted, "they can't get us all."

Going off to follow your link.

 

Up ]